Product - HonorIQ | Honor Labs

The exhibit

What a result looks like

One search result carries everything a compliance lead or counsel needs to check it. The terms below are the ones legal teams already use - and where each one lands on the screen.

A live HonorIQ result: the Abstract, the Focus and Coverage readings, and numbered citations with View Source links

1 2 3 4 5 6

1The Abstract - what the law says, from the retrieved provisions only

2Jurisdiction Focus - the controlling state on the query

3Coverage - disclosure of scope, on the answer itself

4The citation line - chapter, section, and the provision's title

5The state tag - the jurisdiction on every card

6View Source - one click to the government's own page

The term	What it means	Where it is on the result
Primary authority	The law itself - statute, regulation, official code - not commentary about it.	Every numbered citation: Ohio Admin. Code 4729:5-5-11, ORC 3719.05.
Jurisdiction-specific controlling law	The rule that governs in this state, with the federal floor where it applies.	The Focus chip on the query and the state tag on every card.
Cite-checkable	Every assertion traceable to the official text - cited to the section, with the provision's title, quotable in work product.	The citation line and the View Source link: one click to the government's own page.
Currency	Whether this is the law today - repealed and superseded text is never presented as current.	The result set itself: superseded sections are marked and never returned as current law.
Structural context	Where the rule sits in the code, so it can be read in place.	The chapter and section on the citation line - 4729:5-5-11 within Chapter 4729:5.
Disclosure of scope	What we hold and what we don't, stated on the answer itself.	The Coverage reading on every answer - and "not held" said plainly when it's true.
No interpretation	What the law says, not what it means - judgment stays with counsel.	The Abstract: written from the retrieved provisions only, followed by the citations that support it.

HonorIQ retrieves and cites the law. It does not provide legal advice or interpretation.

The Honor Standard

Every source. Direct legal traceback. No interpretation.

Three rules the platform is engineered under. They are why the answer on the screen is one your compliance lead can defend and your counsel can check.

Government sources only

Every answer is built from primary government authority - statutes, regulations, official code. No aggregator summaries, no commentary.

primary authority

Every answer shows its authority

Nothing is asserted without a citation traceable to the official source. Verifiable by you.

cite-checkable

We never interpret

HonorIQ surfaces what the law says. Judgment stays with your counsel.

no interpretation

Three of the standing rules HonorIQ is engineered under.

Between the pharmacist and Legal

The question comes at the counter. Counsel is not in the room.

At the counter, the question is immediate: can this prescription be transferred, can this program ship there, what does this state require. The pharmacist gets the controlling provision in seconds - cited, openable at the source - instead of an answer from memory.

Counsel gets work product they did not have to produce: section-level citations with provision titles, traceable to the official text, in the format legal review already uses. The questions that reach them are the ones that need judgment.

The organization gets one answer both sides can stand on - the same provision on the pharmacist's screen and in the compliance file, defensible in an audit because every line of it can be checked against the government's own page.

Working with compliance and counsel

Public law, nothing else.

HonorIQ holds statutes and regulations - public law, nothing else. No PHI or PII, ever. Nothing to install, nothing to integrate, no patient data in scope: a security review with very little to review.

Honor Labs was built by an operator who has sat on your side of the table - who wrote a healthcare company's HIPAA policies and stood up its first SOC audits before writing a line of this platform.

Where the corpus stands today

Deep where our partners are. Building in partner order.

This map grows with every partner. New jurisdictions come online in the order our partners set, and we update this page the day they go live.

Federal floor: Complete - 21 USC / 21 CFR: 503A, 503B, DSCSA, DEA (21 CFR 1300s, 211, 205).
Deep: Illinois - practice act and board code at section level, including 2026 amendments. Ohio - pharmacy and compounding rules; ASC facility rules seeded.
Comparison: Indiana, Wisconsin, Iowa, Michigan, Missouri, Minnesota.
Partial: New York.
Building next: Kentucky, Arizona, Texas, Florida, California - in partner order.
Not yet held: The remaining states - and the platform says so on any answer that touches them.

Don't see your state?

Tell us which states you operate in. Our partners set the build order, and every state we add is a state every customer gets.

Request a state

Bring us your five hardest state questions.

Request a demo and we'll answer them live, with citations - within one business day of hearing from you.

Request a demo

Ask in plain English. Get the provisions, cited.